<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unjournalism &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unjournalism.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unjournalism.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the front lines of PR in the Web world. Helping people tell their stories. It&#039;s not journalism -- it&#039;s Unjournalism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some changes</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/03/10/some-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/03/10/some-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idea Peepshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who pay somewhat closer attention to me than others know that I have a new job. I&#8217;m doing rather similar work to what I did at my previous gig &#8212; helping clients understand how to put the power the of the Web to good use and helping them communicate more effectively &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who pay somewhat closer attention to me than others know that I have a <a href="http://fasthorseinc.com">new job</a>. I&#8217;m doing rather similar work to what I did at my previous gig &#8212; helping clients understand how to put the power the of the Web to good use and helping them communicate more effectively &#8212; just in a new environment and with new people. &#8220;New people&#8221; as in &#8220;new to me&#8221;; it&#8217;s not at all the case that these folks were born yesterday.</p>
<p>Anyway, the reason I&#8217;m talking about this is because it&#8217;s probably going to affect what I do here. Not it a bad way &#8212; I&#8217;m not being censored for the sake of corporate politics or anything like that. It&#8217;s just that:</p>
<p>A) I&#8217;ve been busy as I work to get my legs under me at the new gig and</p>
<p>B) I&#8217;m excited about doing some writing for the agency&#8217;s <a href="http://www.fasthorseinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/05/my-unborn-child-is-on-twitter/">own blog</a>, which has some serious thematic overlap, if you will, with Unjournalism.</p>
<p>I have no intention of stopping writing here at Unjournalism &#8212; or anywhere else I write, for that matter. I do, however, have to put some good brain power into determining how I can best accommodate all <a href="http://thesamerowdycrowd.wordpress.com">of</a> <a href="http://ideapeepshow.com">my</a> <a href="http://michaelkeliher.com">online </a><a href="http://betterdiscourse.wordpress.com">homes</a> without too much overlap but still keeping each relevant and interesting.</p>
<p>In the meantime, there&#8217;s not a creature or employer alive who can stop me from Twittering, apparently, so you can get all the Mike you can handle <a href="http://twitter.com/mjkeliher">over there</a>.</p>
<p>So bear with me. I promise not to suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/03/10/some-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs rule</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/11/blogs-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/11/blogs-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part of why the blogosphere is awesome: The folks at Gizmodo bring us a post that contain reasonable iPod-news speculation based on something Apple didn&#8217;t do. That&#8217;s right: The absence of action led a tipster to make an astute observation about a possible announcement from Apple. Booo corporate secrets. Hooray group-think. Technorati Tags: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/ipods-invisible-in-ads-199610.php">why the blogosphere is awesome</a>: The folks at Gizmodo bring us a post that contain reasonable iPod-news speculation based on something Apple <i>didn&#8217;t</i> do. That&#8217;s right: The absence of action led a tipster to make an astute observation about a possible announcement from Apple.</p>
<p>Booo corporate secrets. Hooray group-think.<br />
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Gizmodo%20iPod%20blogosphere" rel="tag"></a></p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Gizmodo" rel="tag">Gizmodo</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Apple" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iPod" rel="tag">iPod</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blogosphere" rel="tag">blogosphere</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/11/blogs-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia is more popular than [lots of big names]</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/wikipedia-is-more-popular-than-lots-of-big-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/wikipedia-is-more-popular-than-lots-of-big-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Rubel&#8217;s Micro Persuasion has a nifty little post on the idea of &#8220;Wikipedia is more popular than&#8230;&#8221; At certain points in time, Wikipedia has been more popular than Amazon.com, CNN.com, NYTimes.com and other media big dogs. Hooray for social media! Technorati Tags: Steve Rubel Micro Persuasion Wikipedia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Rubel&#8217;s Micro Persuasion has a nifty little post on the idea of &#8220;<a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/09/wikipedia_is_mo.html">Wikipedia is more popular than&#8230;</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>At certain points in time, Wikipedia has been more popular than Amazon.com, CNN.com, NYTimes.com and other media big dogs. Hooray for social media!</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/steve%20rubel" rel="tag">Steve Rubel</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Micro%20Persuasion" rel="tag">Micro Persuasion</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Wikipedia" rel="tag">Wikipedia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/wikipedia-is-more-popular-than-lots-of-big-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who gives a SHIT about Paris Hilton? Fox News does</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/who-gives-a-shit-about-paris-hilton-fox-news-does/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/who-gives-a-shit-about-paris-hilton-fox-news-does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m watching Fox News Channel, and right before a ticker-tape item about the new Bin Laden footage is this: Paris Hilton arrested for drunk driving Who gives half a shit? Isn&#8217;t that what E! and Us Weekly are for? Why is Fox News wasting time, space and effort on this? I&#8217;m sure other &#8220;news&#8221; outlets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m watching Fox News Channel, and right before a ticker-tape item about the new Bin Laden footage is this:</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Paris Hilton arrested for drunk driving</p></blockquote>
<p>Who gives half a shit? Isn&#8217;t that what E! and Us Weekly are for? Why is Fox News wasting time, space and effort on this? I&#8217;m sure other &#8220;news&#8221; outlets are doing it, too, but I&#8217;m not watching them right now.</p>
<p>When will it end?</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Fox%20News" rel="tag">Fox News</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Paris%20Hilton" rel="tag">Paris Hilton</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/07/who-gives-a-shit-about-paris-hilton-fox-news-does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racist cop Mark Fuhrman a Fox News commentator?</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/06/racist-cop-mark-fuhrman-a-fox-news-commentator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/06/racist-cop-mark-fuhrman-a-fox-news-commentator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a cable news addict, but I&#8217;m quickly starting to break that nasty habit. I&#8217;ve been disillusioned by a couple of recent examples of some serious UnJournalism. First, as I mentioned a while back, on the same day, MSNBC recently used as &#8220;experts&#8221; an editor from the National Enquirer and shamed media personality Armstrong Williams. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a cable news addict, but I&#8217;m quickly starting to break that nasty habit. I&#8217;ve been disillusioned by a couple of recent examples of some serious UnJournalism.</p>
<p>First, as I mentioned a while back, on the same day, MSNBC recently used as &#8220;experts&#8221; an editor from <a href="http://unjournalism.blogspot.com/2006/08/traditional-media-more-trusted-big.html">the National Enquirer and shamed media personality Armstrong Williams</a>. Now, today I see for the first time (although I gather that it happens regularly!) that Fox News &#8211; Sean Hannity, specifically &#8211; is using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Fuhrman">racist cop Mark Fuhrman</a> as a commentator.</p>
<p>Maybe Mark Fuhrman isn&#8217;t a racist for real, but many (most?) people think so after the O.J. Simpson trial. Seriously, read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Fuhrman">his Wikipedia entry</a>. At the very least, anything that comes out of his mouth has to be questionable, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s important to note that Sean Hannity is crazy (<a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200409150003">one example</a>), so his choice in &#8220;trusted sources&#8221; is probably warped as shit. But what the hell, man?</p>
<p>Apparently if people have simply <span style="font-style:italic;">heard of you</span>, you&#8217;ll make a better commentator than someone who, you know, <span style="font-style:italic;">knows stuff</span>. What&#8217;s next? Wolf Blitzer interviewing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Tripp">Linda Tripp</a> for a story on data privacy?</p>
<p>(By the way, I have no real reason for picking on CNN right now &#8211; because I never watch CNN. It&#8217;s boring. Maybe that&#8217;s the trade-off: boring or&#8230;Mark Fuhrman&#8217;s crazy ass.)</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Fox%20News" rel="tag">Fox News</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/UnJournalism" rel="tag">UnJournalism</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mark%20Fuhrman" rel="tag">Mark Fuhrman</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sean%20Hannity" rel="tag">Sean Hannity</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/racist" rel="tag">racist</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/crazy" rel="tag">crazy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/06/racist-cop-mark-fuhrman-a-fox-news-commentator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times: New Web Sites Seeking Profit in Wiki Model</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/05/ny-times-new-web-sites-seeking-profit-in-wiki-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/05/ny-times-new-web-sites-seeking-profit-in-wiki-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times yesterday ran a great article about wikis and the proliferation of these everyone&#8217;s-a-contributor sites on the Web. I have one hang-up, though. At one point, Jack Herrick, of eHow.com and wikiHow fame, was quoted as saying: &#8220;I think there’s going to be a lot of wikis,&#8221; Mr. Herrick said. &#8220;But I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times yesterday ran a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/04/technology/04wiki.html">great article about wikis</a> and the proliferation of these everyone&#8217;s-a-contributor sites on the Web. I have one hang-up, though.</p>
<p>At one point, Jack Herrick, of eHow.com and wikiHow fame, was quoted as saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think there’s going to be a lot of wikis,&#8221; Mr. Herrick said. &#8220;But I&#8217;m not sure how many of them will make money.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s probably right: Most surely won&#8217;t make much or any money. However, this statement causes people to lose sight of one important idea: using wikis for something other than simply making money.</p>
<p>Wikis can be great public relations tools. Consider the tremendous community-building and &#8220;sense of ownership&#8221; qualities offered by the wiki idea. Whether you&#8217;re launching a product, testing messages, conducting research or doing several other tasks in which you&#8217;d like input from your audience, wikis can be of great use.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more to this issue than simply making money in the short term. Look at wikis as a long-term tool for establishing thought-leadership and for fostering a strong sense of community and belonging around your brand or organization.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/wiki" rel="tag">wiki</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/wikis" rel="tag">wikis</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/New%20York%20Times" rel="tag">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eHow" rel="tag">eHow</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jack%20Herrick" rel="tag">Jack Herrick</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/public%20relations" rel="tag">public relations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/05/ny-times-new-web-sites-seeking-profit-in-wiki-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PiPress says U of MN students don&#8217;t like beer?</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/01/pipress-says-u-of-mn-students-dont-like-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/01/pipress-says-u-of-mn-students-dont-like-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A story in today&#8217;s St. Paul Pioneer Press says that the University of Minnesota has a new policy that essentially bans alcohol from (all but one of) its dorms &#8211; even for folks who are of legal age. At one point, the reporter states: Students moving or helping move others into U dorms Thursday generally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story in today&#8217;s St. Paul Pioneer Press says that the University of Minnesota has a <a href="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/15412242.htm">new policy that essentially bans alcohol</a> from (all but one of) its dorms &#8211; even for folks who are of legal age.</p>
<p>At one point, the reporter states:</p>
<blockquote><p>Students moving or helping move others into U dorms Thursday generally liked the new policy, though some acknowledged it wouldn&#8217;t stop drinking in the dorms.
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Generally liked&#8221;? [Cough, cough...] Bullshit!</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pioneer%20Press" rel="tag">Pioneer Press</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/University%20of%20Minnesota" rel="tag">University of Minnesota</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/alcohol" rel="tag">alcohol</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/policy" rel="tag">policy</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bullshit" rel="tag">bullshit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/09/01/pipress-says-u-of-mn-students-dont-like-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing to Generation M</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/marketing-to-generation-m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/marketing-to-generation-m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Cody, in a column submitted to PR site Bulldog Reporter, talks about marketing to Generation M, which he says stands for either &#8220;multitasking&#8221; or &#8220;media.&#8221; He cites statistics about how much time kids spend online and how little they watch TV, compared to maybe &#8220;older kids&#8221; in their late 20s or so. First of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Cody, in a column submitted to PR site <a href="http://www.bulldogreporter.com">Bulldog Reporter</a>, talks about <a href="http://www.bulldogreporter.com/dailydog/issues/1_1/dailydog_barks_bites/index.html#4910">marketing to Generation M</a>, which he says stands for either &#8220;multitasking&#8221; or &#8220;media.&#8221; He cites statistics about how much time kids spend online and how little they watch TV, compared to maybe &#8220;older kids&#8221; in their late 20s or so.</p>
<p>First of all, dude, Generation M is about &#8220;multitasking&#8221; or &#8220;media&#8221;? That&#8217;s rather lame. Do we really need more &#8220;Generation [Whatever]s&#8221;? And if you must assign a letter to this &#8220;generation,&#8221; based on your premise, shouldn&#8217;t it be K, for &#8220;Generation Kiss My Ass, Advertiser?&#8221;</p>
<p>Second, Cody says about an 18-year-old girl (his daughter?):</p>
<p>[Marketers are unaware that] Catharine is IMing her “buds” Kimmy, Christie and Sarah, asking their advice on the coolest styles. And, she’ll choose her shoes based upon what her friends say, not what a TV spot or traditional placement tells her to do.</p>
<p>People keep talking about this social-media era as if it&#8217;s literally a whole new world. It&#8217;s not. The media have changed, but the reality is still the same: I care more about what my friend or my mom or my boss tells me than what a TV commercial or a banner ad or even a well-earned media placement tells me. <i>Of course</i>. This isn&#8217;t only true now, but it&#8217;s also true for the folks who were around well before Al Gore invented the Internet. But some folks, like Cody, talk about this &#8220;new&#8221; era in which &#8211; gasp &#8211; kids don&#8217;t care about ads!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like text messaging or DVR changed that. I still don&#8217;t <i>want</i> to see advertising, but everyone knows it&#8217;s place. And that place, of course, is the 16 minutes during &#8220;Lost&#8221; in which I flip past 40 pages of ads in Rolling Stone. (And then buy what my friend bought because he&#8217;s smarter than <a href="http://http://www.cpbgroup.com/">Crispin Porter + Bogusky</a> will ever be.)</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Steven%20Cody" rel="tag">Steven Cody</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bulldog%20Reporter" rel="tag">Bulldog Reporter</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Generation%20M" rel="tag">Generation M</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/social%20media" rel="tag">social media</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/multitasking" rel="tag">multitasking</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/marketing" rel="tag">marketing</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/text%20messaging" rel="tag">text messaging</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Crispin%20Porter%20+%20Bogusky" rel="tag">Crispin Porter + Bogusky</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/marketing-to-generation-m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post goes blog-style</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/washington-post-goes-blog-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/washington-post-goes-blog-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My home boy Steve Rubel is reporting that the Washington Post is taking blog-like comments on its online news stories. This social-media turn from a huge print-news institution is a big bump for the news world &#8211; and the related consumers. I can&#8217;t begin to express how cool this is. WashPo has been embracing social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My home boy Steve Rubel is reporting that the <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/08/washington_post_2.html">Washington Post is taking blog-like comments</a> on its online news stories. This social-media turn from a huge print-news institution is a big bump for the news world &#8211; and the related consumers. I can&#8217;t begin to express how cool this is.</p>
<p>WashPo has been embracing social media for a while. Some time ago it integrated Technorati tags, links and searches with it online content. Good for them. They&#8217;re not changing what they&#8217;re doing, but they&#8217;re wisely adding to what they do. I&#8217;m excited to see what comes in the future.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Washington%20Post" rel="tag">Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Steve%20Rubel" rel="tag">Steve Rubel</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Micro%20Persuasion" rel="tag">Micro Persuasion</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog" rel="tag">blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/comments" rel="tag">comments</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/social%20media" rel="tag">social media</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/31/washington-post-goes-blog-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lose 30 pound in ten minutes with Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/30/lose-30-pound-in-ten-minutes-with-photoshop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/30/lose-30-pound-in-ten-minutes-with-photoshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katie Couric isn&#8217;t fat. In fact, she&#8217;s quite an attractive woman. Still, the folks in the CBS promo department (yes, they&#8217;re still talking about her) think she could stand to lose a few. I could fire off a rant about how the media portray women in a way that make less-than-&#8221;perfect&#8221; women feel terrible about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie Couric isn&#8217;t fat. In fact, she&#8217;s quite an attractive woman. Still, the folks in the CBS promo department (yes, they&#8217;re still talking about her) think <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/couric_watch/katies_extreme_makeover_42842.asp">she could stand to lose a few</a>.</p>
<p>I could fire off a rant about how the media portray women in a way that make less-than-&#8221;perfect&#8221; women feel terrible about an extra couple pounds&#8230;but I don&#8217;t care. This is just funny as hell.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/couricaug29.jpg" /></p>
<p>Thanks to TV Newser for the photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2006/08/30/lose-30-pound-in-ten-minutes-with-photoshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

