<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unjournalism &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unjournalism.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unjournalism.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the front lines of PR in the Web world. Helping people tell their stories. It&#039;s not journalism -- it&#039;s Unjournalism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Short URLs, trust and security</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/10/06/short-urls-trust-and-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/10/06/short-urls-trust-and-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Immediate Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shel Holtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short URLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browsing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent episode of the For Immediate Release podcast &#8212; I believe it was show 486 &#8212; included a discussion about worms on Twitter and the connection with the (in)security of shortened URLs shared online. As FIR co-host Shel Holtz alluded to, even if you trust the sender or sharer of a shortened URL, those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-246" style="border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 8px; margin-bottom: 8px;" title="yellow_padlock" src="http://www.unjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/yellow_padlock.jpg" alt="yellow_padlock" width="450" height="302" /></p>
<p>A recent episode of the For Immediate Release podcast &#8212; I believe it was show <a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/index.php?/weblog/comments/the_hobson_holtz_report_-_podcast_486_september_24_2009/">486</a> &#8212; included a discussion about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm">worms</a> on Twitter and the connection with the (in)security of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_URL">shortened URLs</a> shared online. As FIR co-host <a href="http://blog.holtz.com">Shel Holtz</a> alluded to, even if you trust the sender or sharer of a shortened URL, those links &#8212; which mask the destination with a simpler, shorter tinyurl.com or bit.ly address &#8212; are fraught with danger. Or, at least, potential danger.</p>
<p>This is something I&#8217;ve discussed more than once with my friend and local code wizard <a href="http://garrickvanburen.com/">Garrick Van Buren</a>. He&#8217;s built his own URL shortener, <a href="http://grv.me/">grv.me</a>, that he uses to share stuff he creates. He&#8217;s done the same for <a href="http://www.minnpost.com">MinnPost.com</a> with its <a href="http://minnpo.st/">minnpo.st</a> URL shortener, which the local news outfit uses to share its own stories on Twitter and the like.</p>
<p>Why? Trust. When you see a TinyURL, you have no idea what the link is going to point you to. Viruses, spyware, porn and all sorts of other unwanted or inappropriate stuff are just a click away. Sure, there are <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/tinyurl/see-where-a-tinyurl-is-pointing-with-tin-foil-hat-251849.php">some</a> <a href="http://twitspam.org/?p=1254">tricks</a> to help alleviate that problem, but what if you actually could trust a shortened URL?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s there grv.me and minnpo.st come in. Once you&#8217;re familiar with them &#8212; once their respective publishers introduce you to them &#8212; you can trust them as much as you trust their publishers. Because you know only Garrick can create grv.me URLs, there&#8217;s no virus at the other end. Coke, a client of <a href="http://www.fasthorseinc.com">ours</a>, also <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/08/04/cokeurl/">created its own URL shortener</a> &#8212; with trust being one factor and, I&#8217;m sure, the desire to control the technology rather than rely on someone else&#8217;s as another factor. (though we had nothing to do with the creation of this tool).</p>
<p>The need for safety and security online will not go away. Don&#8217;t worry: Smart people like Garrick will be here to help.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zach_manchester/778691182/"><em>Photo courtesy of zach_manchester on Flickr</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2009/10/06/short-urls-trust-and-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

