<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unjournalism &#187; citizen journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unjournalism.com/category/citizen-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unjournalism.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the front lines of PR in the Web world. Helping people tell their stories. It&#039;s not journalism -- it&#039;s Unjournalism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Acknowledge the power of giving people a voice</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/25/acknowledge-the-power-of-giving-people-a-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/25/acknowledge-the-power-of-giving-people-a-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Keen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stowe Boyd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a picked a good time to start reading Stowe Boyd&#8217;s blog (thanks to continual references from Shel Holtz and Neville Hobson). In a post from about 10 days ago, Stowe writes about Andrew Keen, whom I&#8217;ve never heard of. Apparently Andrew doesn&#8217;t like new &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; toys and the (debatable) impact their having. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a picked a good time to start reading <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/">Stowe Boyd&#8217;s blog</a> (thanks to continual references from <a href="http://blog.holtz.com">Shel Holtz</a> and <a href="http://www.nevillehobson.com">Neville Hobson</a>). In a post from about 10 days ago, Stowe writes <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2007/04/andrew_keen_the.html">about Andrew Keen</a>, whom I&#8217;ve never heard of. Apparently Andrew doesn&#8217;t like new &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; toys and the (debatable) impact their having.</p>
<p>Keen calls the Cluetrain Manifesto &#8212; actually, the theses within &#8212; &#8220;childish.&#8221; I might not agree with them all, but I wouldn&#8217;t consider them childish or naive, which I think Keen is confusing with &#8220;simple and straightforward.&#8221;</p>
<p>Keen also draws out the stupid &#8220;70 million blogs&#8221; stat and refers to the blogosphere (is there a worse word in the world?) as &#8220;our own electronic diaries, our own half-informed opinions, our own stupidity and ignorance.&#8221; I hate the &#8220;70 million&#8221; stat as a defense &#8212; &#8220;Yuh huh! Blogging <em>is to</em> cool!&#8221; &#8212; and I hate it even more when its used in conjunction with &#8220;&#8230;but most of them are worthless.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, most of them are worthless to most people. But I don&#8217;t care about &#8220;most of them.&#8221; I care that now I can get the scoops and info of <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a>, the professional insight and camaraderie for <a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz">For Immediate Release</a>, and the piles of other great information and entertainment I get from people I never would have heard of were it not for blogging and podcasting. It&#8217;s not about 70 million; in my case, it&#8217;s about the few dozens blogs and podcast that make up my list of must-read, -see or -hear.</p>
<p>New media are not killing or disintermediating traditional media; they are complementing traditional media. Expertise, authority and power (as they pertain to knowledge and the communication thereof) aren&#8217;t determined by ownership of an FCC license or a printing press. They are determined by the respect of others. Narcissistic and informationless blogs won&#8217;t earn respect, won&#8217;t establish experts, won&#8217;t wield power. Good blogs will.</p>
<p>Sweeping generalizations about the value or lack of value of blogs and podcasts won&#8217;t get us anywhere. I&#8217;m not asking you to give up the newspaper and devote yourself to new media. I ask that people acknowledge the power of giving more people a public voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/25/acknowledge-the-power-of-giving-people-a-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

