<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you handle one more post about Target&#8217;s blog policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the front lines of PR in the Web world. Helping people tell their stories. It's not journalism -- it's Unjournalism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:21:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keliher</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-12184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-12184</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all of the comments, folks. Michael, that&#039;s particularly insightful, a good look beyond this incident at the larger issue here: People who write blogs are increasingly welcomed into the fold of people who can help spread relevant ideas. Organizations like Target will come around eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all of the comments, folks. Michael, that&#8217;s particularly insightful, a good look beyond this incident at the larger issue here: People who write blogs are increasingly welcomed into the fold of people who can help spread relevant ideas. Organizations like Target will come around eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>I think Target might want to keep in mind that for every Target there is an association offering press passes to a bloggers. For every Target there is an executive picking up the phone to talk with a blogger. For every Target there are PR departments busy with hundreds of other projects who respond with enthusiasm to a blogger&#039;s request. How do I know this? Because we regularly contact companies, executives and PR departments and you&#039;d be surprised how many of them generously give us a lot more than the time of day. Target might want to keep that in mind. Just our experience, but they&#039;re the exception, not the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Target might want to keep in mind that for every Target there is an association offering press passes to a bloggers. For every Target there is an executive picking up the phone to talk with a blogger. For every Target there are PR departments busy with hundreds of other projects who respond with enthusiasm to a blogger&#8217;s request. How do I know this? Because we regularly contact companies, executives and PR departments and you&#8217;d be surprised how many of them generously give us a lot more than the time of day. Target might want to keep that in mind. Just our experience, but they&#8217;re the exception, not the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keliher</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-11901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-11901</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good distinction, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good distinction, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-11888</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-11888</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between a &quot;substantial response&quot; and a &quot;respectful response.&quot; I think every customer inquiry deserves the latter, don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between a &#8220;substantial response&#8221; and a &#8220;respectful response.&#8221; I think every customer inquiry deserves the latter, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keliher</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-11875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-11875</guid>
		<description>I agree, but at the same time, I don&#039;t dare pretend this is easy. I&#039;d love to have had Target respond as if the NY Times were calling, but I don&#039;t believe EVERY SINGLE inquiry warrants a substantial response. It&#039;s a tough line to walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but at the same time, I don&#8217;t dare pretend this is easy. I&#8217;d love to have had Target respond as if the NY Times were calling, but I don&#8217;t believe EVERY SINGLE inquiry warrants a substantial response. It&#8217;s a tough line to walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela V (@prprof_mv)</title>
		<link>http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-11874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela V (@prprof_mv)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unjournalism.com/2008/01/29/can-you-handle-one-more-post-about-targets-blog-policy/#comment-11874</guid>
		<description>I love the last paragraph! Sounds like the beginning of a manifesto.

Your explanation is plausible, I see how you can draw the conclusion that the PR person refused to cooperate *because* the person calling was a blogger. However, there&#039;s still reasonable doubt, we can&#039;t know for sure what that person was thinking... I wonder if that person is doing his/her thinking some place else now?

Anyway, I guess we owe this person for teaching us a valuable lesson: That she should have answered as if it were the NY Times calling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the last paragraph! Sounds like the beginning of a manifesto.</p>
<p>Your explanation is plausible, I see how you can draw the conclusion that the PR person refused to cooperate *because* the person calling was a blogger. However, there&#8217;s still reasonable doubt, we can&#8217;t know for sure what that person was thinking&#8230; I wonder if that person is doing his/her thinking some place else now?</p>
<p>Anyway, I guess we owe this person for teaching us a valuable lesson: That she should have answered as if it were the NY Times calling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
