Comments on: Natch Watch: PRWeek strikes again http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/11/natch-watch-prweek-strikes-again/ Thoughts from the front lines of PR in the Web world. Helping people tell their stories. It's not journalism -- it's Unjournalism. Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:02:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Keith http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/11/natch-watch-prweek-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-303 Keith Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:11:17 +0000 http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=71#comment-303 Valid point. I too was poking fun. We know now what awaits us if we resort to natch! Best, K. Valid point. I too was poking fun. We know now what awaits us if we resort to natch!

Best, K.

]]> By: Mike http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/11/natch-watch-prweek-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-302 Mike Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:05:34 +0000 http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=71#comment-302 I'm just poking fun. I really do like the PRWeek blog, but unfortunately, I also really dislike "natch." Call me a prick, but it just bugs me. As far as the dictionary thing: What are your thoughts on "ain't"? <a href="http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=ain't" rel="nofollow">http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=ain't</a> It's in the dictionary, but as any little kid will tell you, "ain't ain't a word." :) I’m just poking fun. I really do like the PRWeek blog, but unfortunately, I also really dislike “natch.” Call me a prick, but it just bugs me.

As far as the dictionary thing: What are your thoughts on “ain’t”?

http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=ain't

It’s in the dictionary, but as any little kid will tell you, “ain’t ain’t a word.” :)

]]> By: Keith http://www.unjournalism.com/2007/04/11/natch-watch-prweek-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-301 Keith Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:00:48 +0000 http://www.unjournalism.com/?p=71#comment-301 Mike, Appreciate the link, and you're right, natch is not a pretty thing. Two things - one, I'd like to point out we're natch free on PRWeek.com proper since 2001 http://www.prweek.com/us/search/?lstJournalCodes=PRS&fuseaction=PRS.Search.Results&sSearchPhrase=natch and two, a minor tweak, by a dictionary's very definition, isn't any item that is located in one a word? Anyways, keep reading. Respectfully, Keith Mike,

Appreciate the link, and you’re right, natch is not a pretty thing.

Two things – one, I’d like to point out we’re natch free on PRWeek.com proper since 2001 http://www.prweek.com/us/search/?lstJournalCodes=PRS&fuseaction=PRS.Search.Results&sSearchPhrase=natch

and two, a minor tweak, by a dictionary’s very definition, isn’t any item that is located in one a word?

Anyways, keep reading.

Respectfully,
Keith

]]>