Entries Tagged as ''

Keith Olbermann must be stopped

Alright, Keith. The pedantic, ego-driven “Special Comment” segment of your show must now die. It’s too much.

The first one was refreshing. It lacked the shmucky condescension of Anderson Cooper, and it had a level-headedness you’d never in a million years get from a Bill O’Reilly. And far smarter than that Wolf Blitzer lame-ass.

The second one was acceptable. Hell, the first was so good, why not try again.

Now, though, you’re killing me. Today’s rant, like a couple before it, is over the top. It’s bad enough that these “special” commentaries take on a forced, unnatural where’s-my-thesaurus tone. But when you’re taking this self-righteous high road, don’t do so based on a blatantly out-of-context quote.

In today’s rant against President Bush, Keith hangs his hat on the president’s need to apologize to the nation for having the audacity to say that “It’s unacceptable to think.” Pulling this out of what the president actually said is akin to me saying, “Sex with donkeys is disgusting,” and you saying, “Mike likes ’sex with donkeys.’ ”

What the president actually said: “It’s unacceptable to think that there’s any kind of comparison between the behavior of the United States of America and the action of Islamic extremists who kill innocent women and children to achieve an objective.”

Argue about the implications of that statement all day long. Go ahead. But Olbmermann fouled badly here.

If the president were to take a detractors words so far out of context and make a national media spectacle out of that abomination, surely Olbermann and his producers would shit themselves at the opportunity for some “let’s re-air Keith’s bit all day and ‘debate’ about it on cable news” attention.

I’m honestly surprised at this. I sincerely hope that I’m missing something here.

Technorati Tags:

Off topic: Apple iPhone announced today?

Gizmodo brings us a photo of an alleged mock-up of this alleged Apple iPhone people keep allegedly talking about - allegedly. I don’t care if it’s real or not (well, I do - because it’s cool), but this thing is bad ass. Go check out the pic.

As the folks at Gizmodo said, “…this mock-up is on crumpled paper, and in French! So it has to be true!”

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Blogs rule

This is part of why the blogosphere is awesome: The folks at Gizmodo bring us a post that contain reasonable iPod-news speculation based on something Apple didn’t do. That’s right: The absence of action led a tipster to make an astute observation about a possible announcement from Apple.

Booo corporate secrets. Hooray group-think.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Wikipedia is more popular than [lots of big names]

Steve Rubel’s Micro Persuasion has a nifty little post on the idea of “Wikipedia is more popular than…

At certain points in time, Wikipedia has been more popular than Amazon.com, CNN.com, NYTimes.com and other media big dogs. Hooray for social media!

Technorati Tags:

Who gives a SHIT about Paris Hilton? Fox News does

I’m watching Fox News Channel, and right before a ticker-tape item about the new Bin Laden footage is this:

Paris Hilton arrested for drunk driving

Who gives half a shit? Isn’t that what E! and Us Weekly are for? Why is Fox News wasting time, space and effort on this? I’m sure other “news” outlets are doing it, too, but I’m not watching them right now.

When will it end?

Technorati Tags:

Racist cop Mark Fuhrman a Fox News commentator?

I’m a cable news addict, but I’m quickly starting to break that nasty habit. I’ve been disillusioned by a couple of recent examples of some serious UnJournalism.

First, as I mentioned a while back, on the same day, MSNBC recently used as “experts” an editor from the National Enquirer and shamed media personality Armstrong Williams. Now, today I see for the first time (although I gather that it happens regularly!) that Fox News - Sean Hannity, specifically - is using racist cop Mark Fuhrman as a commentator.

Maybe Mark Fuhrman isn’t a racist for real, but many (most?) people think so after the O.J. Simpson trial. Seriously, read his Wikipedia entry. At the very least, anything that comes out of his mouth has to be questionable, doesn’t it?

Also, it’s important to note that Sean Hannity is crazy (one example), so his choice in “trusted sources” is probably warped as shit. But what the hell, man?

Apparently if people have simply heard of you, you’ll make a better commentator than someone who, you know, knows stuff. What’s next? Wolf Blitzer interviewing Linda Tripp for a story on data privacy?

(By the way, I have no real reason for picking on CNN right now - because I never watch CNN. It’s boring. Maybe that’s the trade-off: boring or…Mark Fuhrman’s crazy ass.)

Technorati Tags:

NY Times: New Web Sites Seeking Profit in Wiki Model

The New York Times yesterday ran a great article about wikis and the proliferation of these everyone’s-a-contributor sites on the Web. I have one hang-up, though.

At one point, Jack Herrick, of eHow.com and wikiHow fame, was quoted as saying:

“I think there’s going to be a lot of wikis,” Mr. Herrick said. “But I’m not sure how many of them will make money.”

He’s probably right: Most surely won’t make much or any money. However, this statement causes people to lose sight of one important idea: using wikis for something other than simply making money.

Wikis can be great public relations tools. Consider the tremendous community-building and “sense of ownership” qualities offered by the wiki idea. Whether you’re launching a product, testing messages, conducting research or doing several other tasks in which you’d like input from your audience, wikis can be of great use.

There’s more to this issue than simply making money in the short term. Look at wikis as a long-term tool for establishing thought-leadership and for fostering a strong sense of community and belonging around your brand or organization.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

PiPress says U of MN students don’t like beer?

A story in today’s St. Paul Pioneer Press says that the University of Minnesota has a new policy that essentially bans alcohol from (all but one of) its dorms - even for folks who are of legal age.

At one point, the reporter states:

Students moving or helping move others into U dorms Thursday generally liked the new policy, though some acknowledged it wouldn’t stop drinking in the dorms.

“Generally liked”? [Cough, cough...] Bullshit!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,