Entries Tagged as ''

Marketing to Generation M

Steven Cody, in a column submitted to PR site Bulldog Reporter, talks about marketing to Generation M, which he says stands for either “multitasking” or “media.” He cites statistics about how much time kids spend online and how little they watch TV, compared to maybe “older kids” in their late 20s or so.

First of all, dude, Generation M is about “multitasking” or “media”? That’s rather lame. Do we really need more “Generation [Whatever]s”? And if you must assign a letter to this “generation,” based on your premise, shouldn’t it be K, for “Generation Kiss My Ass, Advertiser?”

Second, Cody says about an 18-year-old girl (his daughter?):

[Marketers are unaware that] Catharine is IMing her “buds” Kimmy, Christie and Sarah, asking their advice on the coolest styles. And, she’ll choose her shoes based upon what her friends say, not what a TV spot or traditional placement tells her to do.

People keep talking about this social-media era as if it’s literally a whole new world. It’s not. The media have changed, but the reality is still the same: I care more about what my friend or my mom or my boss tells me than what a TV commercial or a banner ad or even a well-earned media placement tells me. Of course. This isn’t only true now, but it’s also true for the folks who were around well before Al Gore invented the Internet. But some folks, like Cody, talk about this “new” era in which - gasp - kids don’t care about ads!

It’s not like text messaging or DVR changed that. I still don’t want to see advertising, but everyone knows it’s place. And that place, of course, is the 16 minutes during “Lost” in which I flip past 40 pages of ads in Rolling Stone. (And then buy what my friend bought because he’s smarter than Crispin Porter + Bogusky will ever be.)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Washington Post goes blog-style

My home boy Steve Rubel is reporting that the Washington Post is taking blog-like comments on its online news stories. This social-media turn from a huge print-news institution is a big bump for the news world - and the related consumers. I can’t begin to express how cool this is.

WashPo has been embracing social media for a while. Some time ago it integrated Technorati tags, links and searches with it online content. Good for them. They’re not changing what they’re doing, but they’re wisely adding to what they do. I’m excited to see what comes in the future.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Lose 30 pound in ten minutes with Photoshop

Katie Couric isn’t fat. In fact, she’s quite an attractive woman. Still, the folks in the CBS promo department (yes, they’re still talking about her) think she could stand to lose a few.

I could fire off a rant about how the media portray women in a way that make less-than-”perfect” women feel terrible about an extra couple pounds…but I don’t care. This is just funny as hell.

Thanks to TV Newser for the photo.

Duluth cops growing pot?

http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/15387040.htm

A reporter found weed growing very near a police station in Duluth. Funny story, made big news (national TV and the like).

What I want to know is, how did the reporter know is what pot? “Random” drug test for her!

Marketing and YouTube - “no avoiding it”?

In a recent AdAge article about YouTube and marketing, Chad Stoller and Chris Portella from an ad agency called Organic write the following:

Before a brand can [jump into YouTube and other social-media environments], it has to take a good hard look in the mirror and ask, “Am I ready to put myself out there to be commented on, shared, mashed with other content, and generally toyed with?” Not every brand is comfortable with this, but if the goal is to create an authentic connection with consumers, there’s no avoiding it. It has already been proven that confident brands win in the web 2.0 culture.

“No avoiding it”? Really?

Generally, these two make good points, and maybe I’m being too picky, but I think this statement goes a bit too far: “…if the goal is to create an authentic connection with consumers, there’s no avoiding [the openness and possible hassles of YouTube and the like].” That statement assumes that either A) the world has already changed so much that the only effective marketing is done with an online video or a popular blog, or B) that no brand has ever actually created “an authentic connection with consumers.” I think both of those ideas are wildly inaccurate.

Sure, social media / new media / emerging media / Web 2.0 (whatever you want to call “it”) is a huge new wave in communication, entertainment, marketing and several other fields. And yes, the marketing and PR firm I work for is smart enough to be deeply involved in podcasting and digital video, but saying there’s “no avoiding” social media if you want consumer connection - I don’t buy it.

Jeep, specifically with its Wrangler brand, has enjoyed an insanely powerful consumer connection and loyalty. Aftermarket products, off-road driving social gatherings, the “it’s a Jeep thing” slogan… And that started way before the Internet - let alone blogs and YouTube. Same goes for other brands like Nike, Apple, Jack Daniel’s and more.

These guys are on the right track, but let’s not get lost in a fabricated “need” for new technology.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

“Pluto loses place around sun”?

From the DumbJournalism files, here’s one from the Los Angeles Times (via St. Paul Pioneer Press):

Headline: “Pluto loses place around the sun

My comment: Seriously? Who the shit moved it? That had to have been quite a project…

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Traditional media more trusted - big deal?

So TV and newspapers are more trusted than Web sites and blogs, huh? So what? Web sites, and blogs specifically, are still changing the way newspapers and TV work - forever. I’m not saying bloggers will rule the world, or that Rocketboom will soon buyout CNN, but you still can’t ignore them just because they’re not as “trusted.”

And although I agree - I do trust the NY Times more than I trust any news blog to tell me what I need to know - I hate these stupid “what media do you trust?” surveys. Biggest reason: Ask any five people what they meant when they answered the trust question, and you’ll probably get seven different answers.

An exerpt from Editor & Publisher:

Traditional media brands like newspapers and television are far more trusted by the public than Web sites and blogs, according to a survey this week by British interactive marketing company Telecom Express.

1000 respondents were asked what percentage of the information they received from various sources was accurate, true and unbiased, according to Telecom Express.

The most trusted source of information in the survey was television, which scored 66 percent among respondents.

Wait? TV is the most trusted? Note that, just yesterday, MSNBC spent five minutes discussing JonBenet’s murder with an “editor” from the god damn National Enquirer. (Why? He had great pictures of John Mark Karr’s Flock of Seagulls hairdo [not the best pic, but the only one I could find] from back in the day.) Shortly thereafter, the discussed the Survivor race wars with who else but Armstrong Williams. And we all know how trustworthy that pay-me-and-I’ll-say-anything bastard is.

Starting my Christmas wish list

Mom, put this in my stocking this Christmas. Or, if you’re planning on converting, I wouldn’t mind seeing it under the menorah.

Some guy named Art Lebedev is featuring a crazy little thing called the Optimus Keyboard. While you’re at it, Mom, get me two of them - just in case something happens to the first. Love you!

WSJ covers the wonderful world of new media

The Wall Street Journal has a great article about bloggers, podcasters, social-network ass kickers and other assorted people who are now famous for doing stuff that not a single person ever would have noticed if they did it 10 years ago.

Of all the stuff they mention in this article, be sure to check out the Chad Vader video. Priceless.

OK Go strikes again!

Those of you who know OK Go and their fancy dancin’ won’t be too surprised by this: They’re back, and they’ve got another great video for your not-working-at-work pleasure.

This has little to do with the stuff I try to “cover” on UnJournalism, but I don’t care. It’s worth a mention.